Wiki_f©: Diaspora (social network)

wikipedia: diaspora (social network)



Main article: Diaspora (software)

The Diaspora social network is constructed of a network of nodes, or pods, hosted by many different individuals and institutions. Each node operates a copy of the Diaspora software acting as a personal web server. Users of the network can host a pod on their own server or create an account on any existing pod of their choice, and from that pod can interact with other users on all other pods.[4][5][6]

Friendica instances are also a part of the Diaspora social network through the Friendica Diaspora connector.[7]



Diaspora users retain ownership of their data and do not assign ownership rights. The software is specifically designed to allow users to download all their images and text that has been uploaded at any time.[2]

The Diaspora software allows user posts to be designated as either “public” or “limited”. In the latter case, posts may only be read by people assigned to one of the groups, termed aspects, which the user has approved to view the post. Each new account is assigned several default aspects – friends, family, work and acquaintances – and the user can add as many custom aspects as they like.[8] It is possible to follow another user’s public posts without the mutual friending required by other social networks.[9] Users can also send private messages, called conversations.[10] A user can filter their news stream by aspect.[8]

The developers consider the distributed nature of the network crucial to its design and success:[2]

Diaspora’s distributed design is a huge part of it. Like the Internet itself, Diaspora* isn’t housed in any one place, and it’s not controlled by any one entity (including us). We’ve created software that lets you set up and run your own social network on your own “pod” (or server) and connect your network to the larger Diaspora* ecosystem. You can have a pod all to yourself, or one for just you and your friends, or your family, giving you complete ownership and control over your personal social information (including your identity, your posts, and your photos) and how it’s all stored and shared. Or you can simply … sign up at one of [the] open pods.[2]

The distributed design attracted members of the militant Islamist extremist group ISIS after their propaganda campaigns were censored by Twitter.[11][12][13][14] Diaspora developers issued a statement urging users to report offensive content, but due to the design of the service were unable to block content without the approval of pod admins.[15]

Diaspora has been specifically noted by U.S. National Public Radio for its policy that allows the use of pseudonyms, in contrast to competitor Facebook, which does not.[4]

Posts in Diaspora can include hashtags and ‘mentions’ (a username preceded by a @ symbol). Users can upload photos to posts, and can format text and links using Markdown. Posts can be propagated to connected accounts on Facebook, Twitter and Tumblr. Diaspora supports embedding of media from YouTube, Vimeo and a number of other sites, and also supports OpenGraph previews.[10]



The Diaspora project was founded in 2010 by four students at New York University’s Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, Ilya Zhitomirskiy, Dan Grippi, Max Salzberg, and Raphael Sofaer. The word diaspora is Greek in origin and refers to a scattered or dispersed population.[16]

Ilya Zhitomirskiy and Daniel Grippi (2011)

Grippi, Salzberg, Sofaer, and Zhitomirskiy started the Diaspora project after being motivated by a February 5, 2010 speech by Columbia University law professor Eben Moglen. In his speech, delivered to the Internet Society‘s New York Chapter, “Freedom in the Cloud”, Moglen described centralized social networks as “spying for free.”[6][17] In a New York Times interview, Salzberg said “When you give up that data, you’re giving it up forever … The value they give us is negligible in the scale of what they are doing, and what we are giving up is all of our privacy.” Sofaer said, “We don’t need to hand our messages to a hub. What Facebook gives you as a user isn’t all that hard to do. All the little games, the little walls, the little chat, aren’t really rare things. The technology already exists”.[6] However, Salzberg has said that “Facebook is not what we are going after”.[18]

The group decided to address this problem by creating a distributed social network. To obtain the necessary funds the project was launched on April 24, 2010 on Kickstarter, a crowd funding website. The first 39 days were assigned to raise the US$10,000 that they estimated would be needed to get started. However, the initial funding goal was met in just 12 days and the project eventually raised more than US$200,000 from more than 6000 backers (making it the second most successful Kickstarter project of its time).[19] Grippi said, “We were shocked. For some strange reason, everyone just agreed with this whole privacy thing.” Among the donors was Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg who contributed an undisclosed amount, saying “I donated. I think it is a cool idea.”[6][20][21][22]

“Diaspora is trying to destroy the idea that one network can be totally dominant,” stated Sofaer in laying down the aim of Diaspora.[20]


Work on the Diaspora software began in May 2010. Finn Brunton, a teacher and digital media researcher at New York University, described their method as “a return of the classic geek means of production: pizza and ramen and guys sleeping under the desks because it is something that it is really exciting and challenging.”[6] A developer preview was released on September 15 and received criticism for various security bugs.[23]

The first Diaspora “pod” was launched by the development team on November 23, 2010; as a private, invitation-only alpha.[24]

In December 2010 ReadWriteWeb named the project as one of its Top 10 Start-Ups of 2010, saying “Diaspora certainly represents the power of crowd funding, as well as an interest in making sure the social Web is not centralized in one company”.[21] On 7 January 2011 Black Duck Software named the project one of its Open Source Rookies of 2010, for being “the privacy aware, personally controlled, do-it-all, open source social network. “,[25]

In September 2011, although the network and its software was still in alpha, Terry Hancock of Free Software Magazine described it as “already quite usable for some purposes”. While it supported text, photographs, and links, it still lacked some features, including link preview, the ability to upload or embed videos (although videos could be linked to on other services) and chat. Animated GIFs were supported, however.[5]

Since its release, features of Diaspora have appeared in similar forms in other social networks.[26] In a September 2011 message the developers noted similarities such as Google+‘s “circles” (a version of Diaspora’s aspects) and new sets of user privacy controls implemented by Facebook. They said “we can’t help but be pleased with the impact our work has had”. That Google borrowed heavily from Diaspora was a particular point of pride for Zhitomirskiy, although Google denied that Diaspora had influenced their designs.[20][27]

In October 2011, Diaspora announced that it was starting a fundraising campaign. Maxwell Salzberg explained, “The key right now is to build something that our community wants to use and that makes a difference in our users’ lives. In the future, we will work with our community to determine with them how we could best turn Diaspora* into a self-sustaining operation.” Within days of commencing the campaign over US$45,000 had been raised when PayPal froze Diaspora’s account without explanation. After a large number of complaints to PayPal from Diaspora users and the threat of legal action, the account was unfrozen with an apology from a PayPal executive, but still without explanation. This incident prompted the acceptance of other payment processors, including Stripe and Bitcoin.[28][29][30][31]

The Diaspora Project website was started on September 29, 2011.[32] Its declared mission is “to build a new and better social web, one that’s 100% owned and controlled by you and other Diasporans.”[2]

On November 12, 2011 co-founder Zhitomirskiy committed suicide, at the age of twenty-two. Reports linked pressures related to Diaspora to his death.[20][33][34][35] Zhitomirskiy’s mother, Inna Zhitomirskiy, said, “I strongly believe that if Ilya did not start this project and stayed in school, he would be well and alive today.”[20]

In February 2012 the developers wrote that their own research indicated a change in the focus for the project. They stated that, unlike other social networking websites, on which users mostly interact with people they know in real life, on Diaspora users mostly interact with people from all over the world whom they do not know. Whereas traditional social media mostly deals with user’s trivial daily details, much of the traffic on Diaspora deals with ideas and social causes. As a result, the developers decided to make changes to the interface to better facilitate more lengthy and detailed conversations on complex subjects as the project progresses towards beta status.[36]

In August 2012, the remaining founders formally handed the project over to its community.[37] Since that date, Diaspora has been fully developed and managed by its community members. The focus of the community development team has been on creating stable software releases to act as a basis for further development, which included adopting a semantic versioning system for releases, improving the performance of data federation between pods, and enabling as many volunteers as possible to write code for the project. The project has also adopted the Loomio platform to enable democratic group decision-making.[3]


On September 14, 2011 Terry Hancock of Free Software Magazine endorsed the Diaspora network in an article entitled, Why You Should Join Diaspora Now, Like Your Freedom Depends On It, calling it “good enough” for mainstream use. In explaining his reasoning for encouraging people to sign up he stated:[5]

With all of the concerns over who controls the “Social Web” (We’ve addressed some of these problems before in Free Software Magazine) – regarding the Google+ name policy and other privacy issues, Facebook’s questionable ethics, and the overall danger of controlled networks. I think it is extremely important for a more decentralized, more democratic, more open, and more free solution to succeed in the interest of personal freedom on the internet. And it looks to me like Diaspora is an essential part of that solution, so I’m endorsing it now, even though it’s not entirely “ready”.[5]

On November 14, 2011 Suw Charman-Anderson wrote in, in connection to Zhitomirskiy’s death, about why Diaspora’s slower growth can be an advantage:[38]

One key difference, however, is in number of users. Google+ has 40 million, whereas Diaspora has just 180,000 users, in part because the service is still in alpha testing. This might actually work to Diaspora’s advantage in the long run as it will have more time to build a sense of community. Experience shows us that online communities that grow too fast fragment and can become fractious as different groups clash over what kind of behaviour they think should be allowed.[38]

Diaspora was nominated for “Best Social Network” in the 2011 Awards.[39]

This is a free culture licence:

Title picture and article are originally published and updated here and here on wikipedia (licence cc by-sa 3.0).

Altered ad reused by Philipp Adamik 2016 (licence cc by-sa 3.0 01/04/16)


Written By dradministrator

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *